Studying the Effect of Accessibility and Vitality on Urban Space Efficiency in Iran (Case Study: Hamadan City)


1 Lecturer of Urban Design & Planning Department, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Hamadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamadan, Iran.

2 Master of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Hamadan Branch, Hamadan, Iran.


This research seeks the role and effect strength of accessibility and vitality on urban spaces. Urban space is a phenomenon organized by information manifested in various forms, functions and meaning. It is the context of forming and improving social life, representing culture and urbanization of a culture. According to desirable cities, it is deliberated that the cause of this magnificence is their lively and vibrant urban spaces. Regarding this point, weak social interaction of people and lack of optional and social activities in cities of Iran is clearly observed. This issue will remove urbanity attributes of Iranian urban spaces. The research studies two important factors in urban spaces, based on literature review: accessibility and vitality; using library and field study of Hamadan city to find the rate of their effect on urban spaces of Iran. Correlation analysis and questionnaire were used to codify analytic model. The main hypothesis of the research is the weakness of urban spaces in Iranian cities due to poor access and lack of vitality in these spaces, that is acquired by investigating aspects related to access and vitality. The results showed a positive correlation between urban spaces and these two factors, which control 44 percent of urban spaces efficiency as a common courtyard.


Amphoux, P. (1998). La Notion D’ambiance. Irec-Epel: Lausanne.
Bertolini, L. (1999). Spatial development patterns and public transport: The application of an analytical model in the Netherlands. Plan. Pract. Res., 14(2), 199-210.
Bertolini, L., & Djist, M. (2003). Mobility environments and network cities. J. Urban Design, 8(1), 27-43.
Bonanomi, L. (1990). Le Temps Des Rues. Irec-Eple: Lausanne.
Braza, M. (2003). Parks, Community Gardens and Open Space in Urban Neighborhoods. Retrieved May 23, 2012, from
Calthorpe, P. (1993). The Next American Metropolis. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Cowan, R. (2005). The Dictionary of Urbanism. New York: Streetwise Press.
Dickey, J. W., & Watts, T. M. (1978). Analytic Techniques in Urban Regional Planning. New York: McGraw-Hill press.
Dong, X., Ben-Akiva, M. E., Bowman, J. L., & Walker, J. L. (2006). Moving from Trip-based to Activity based Measures of Accessibility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40, 163-180.
Erkip, F. (1997). The distribution of urban public services: The case of parks and recreational services in Ankara. Cities, 14(6), 353-361.
Fokouhi, N., (2004). Urban Anthropology. Tehran: Ney Publication.
Gehl, J. (1996). Life between Buildings: Using Public Space. Third Ed., Copenhagen: Arkitektens Forlag.
Glazer, N., & Lilla, M. (1987). The Public Face of Architecture. New York: Free Press.
Goodmann, W. (1968). Principles and Practice of Urban Planning. Washington: International City Manager’s Association.
Gratz, R.B., & Mintz, N. (1996). Cities: Back from the Edge: New Life for Downtown. New York: Preservation Press, Wiley.
Handy, S. L., & Niemeier, D. A. (1997). Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 29, 1175-1194.
Harnik, P. (2003). The excellent park system: What makes it great and how to get there?. Washington: National Recreation and Parks Association. EBSCO Publishing.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage Press.
Khastou, M., & Rezvani, N. (2010). Effective factors on vitality of urban spaces: Creating a vital urban space relying on the concept of walking shopping center. Journal of Hoviate-Shahr, 4(6), 113-138.
Kiwi, R., & Lokawan, C. (2007). Research Method in Social Sciences. (A. Nikgohar Trans.), 2ndEd. Tehran: Toutya Publication.
Koenig, J. G. (1980). Indicators of urban accessibility: theory and application. Transportation, 9(2), 145-172.
Lang, J. (1987). Creating Architectural Theory. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
Lau, J.C.Y., & Chiu, C.C.H. (2003). Accessibility of low-income workers in Hong Kong. Cities, 20(3), 197-204.
Levinson, D. M. (1998). Accessibility and the journey to work. Journal of Transport Geography, 6(1), 11-21.
Lynch, K. (1984). Good City Form. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lynch, K. (2002). Theory of Good Form City. (A.Bahreiny Trans.).Tehran: Tehran University Press.
Madanipour, A. (2000). Designing Urban Space, (Mortazaee Trans.). Tehran: Urban Processing and Planning Co. Publication.
Marjan Consultant Engineers, (1966). Comprehensive Plan of Hamadan, Hamadan: Housing and Urbanism Organization of Hamadan.
Mouzhdar Advisory Engineers, (1984). Development and Civil Plan of Hamadan. Hamadan: Housing and Urbanism Organization of Hamadan.
Mueller, J. H., Schuessler, K. F., & Costner, H. L. (1977). Statistical reasoning in sociology (2ndEd.). Michigan: Houghton Mifflin.
Nordberg Shultz, K. (1975). Being, Space and Architecture. (M.H. Hafezi Trans.). Tehran: Tehran University Press.
Pakzad, J. (1997). What is Urban Design. Journal of Abadi, 33(2), 31-34.
Pasaogullari, N., & Doratli, N. (2004). Measuring accessibility and utilization of public spaces in Famagusta. Cities, 21(3), 225-232.
Paumier, C. (2007). Creating a Vibrant City Center, (ULI) Urban Land Institute. Washington, DC: Public Land Pub.
Rogers, W. (2003). The Excellent City Park System. What Makes It Great And How To Get There, In P Harnik(Ed).Washington: The Trust for Public Land, Pub.
Salehi, E. (2008). Environmental Characteristics of Secure Urban Spaces. Tehran: Architecture and Urbanism Research Center.
Shoaie, H., Mokhtabad Amrei, S. M., & Habib, F. (2013). Public Urban Spaces: Reflecting the Collective Rituals (Iranian Tkayay and Hosseiniyeh). International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 3(2), 31-38.
Sorkin, M. (1992). Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space. New York: Hill and Wang.
Talen, E. (1998). Visualizing Fairness: Equity Maps for Planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(1), 22-38.
Talen, E., (2000). Measuring the public realm: A preliminary assessment of the link between public space and sense of community. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 17(4), 344-359.
Talen, E. (2003). Neighborhoods as Service Providers: A Methodology for Evaluating Pedestrian Access. Environment and Planning B, 30, 181-200.
Tibbalds, F. (1992). Making People Friendly Towns: Improving the Public Environments in Towns and Cities. Essex: Longman Press, Harlow.
Vernez-Moudon, A. (1992). A Catholic approach to organizing what urban designers should know. J. Plan. Literature, 6(4), 331-349.
Whyte, W. H. (2000). How to Turn a Place Around. Projects for Public Space Inc. Retrieved June 12, 2012, from
Worpole, K. (1992). Towns for People: Transforming Urban Life. Buckingham: University Press.
Yazdanfar, A., Ghaem-maghami, S., & Ahmadpour, P. (2013). Applying design ideas to promote security of urban spaces. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 4(1), 51-62.