Comparative Study of Symbol: Iranian Contemporary Architecture and Seljuk (Case Study:Tombes)



2 islamic azad university sofian branch,sofian, Iran


This article is about the comparative study of symbol in architecture and contemporary Seljuk tombs in Iran. Art is one of the arts associated with various sciences and science concepts, and various features of footprints can be seen. The signs and symbols of architectural buildings and monuments can be helpful. especially for the beauty of motifs and composition, and roles and indications suggest deep thinking and high precision. For example, some architectonic art harmony such as symmetry, proportionality, balance, balance, matching, agreement, similarity, consistency, alignment, and equality are noted. The main question is whether there are similarities and differences between the use of the symbol and sign in the works of the monuments of the two periods of Seljuk and contemporary Iran? The aim of study is to study the architectural monuments of two architectural periods in Iran, with reference to types of signs and symbols of presenting the classification of the places of application of symbols and signs in architectural works. The methodology of this research is based on library studies and existing documents, and the gathering of data and deductions from the issues raised in relation to various types of symbols and signs, its application in the contemporary Seljuk and contemporary Iranian architecture, and research on similar examples. Finally, studying the research of other scholars, compares the architecture of the Seljuk and contemporary period of the Iranian monument with, the perspective of differences, similarities, the use of symbols and signs in the context of architecture.


Arnhem, R. (2007). Systematic Semiotics. (M. Ghayomi Bidhendi, Trans.).(2thed.). Tehran:Samt Publications.
Akbari, A. (2011). the Effect of Sassanian Art and Architecture on the Seljuk Age Architecture. Quarterly of Jurisprudence and Civilization History, 7(27), 79-104.[a1] 
Ahmadi, B. (1992). From Pictorial Signs to the Text: Toward the Semiotics of Visual Communication. (1 th ed.). Tehran: Markaz Publications. 52-72.
Antonius, A. (2002). Poetics of Architecture: Theory of Design. Strategies Toward Subtle Architectural Creativity. (1 th ed.).Tehran: Soroush Publications. 61-90.
Asadi, SH., & Beygzadeh, A. (2015). the role of the mosque in the cultural and social excellence of the Mosque of Khan Khoy. the International Conference on New Achievements in Civil Engineering, Architecture, Environment and Urban Management. Institute of Managers of the Capital of Ideas.Tehran.
Ardalan, N., & Bakhtiari, L. (2011). Sense of Unity (the place of tradition and Sufism in Iranian architecture.(V. Jalili, Trans.) . (1 th ed.). Tehran: Science Publishing.
Awani, R. (2003). The Ontological and Epistemological Foundations of the Symbolic Look of the World, khiyal journal. Journal of the Academy of Arts, 5, 53-42.
Bagheri, S., & Eynifar, A. (2016). Explaining and Limiting the Inclusion and Representation ofSigns in Architecture. Armanshahr Architecture and Urban Planning, 17, 1-10.
BaniMasoud, A. (2012). Contemporary Iranian Architecture, Fifth Edition, Century Art Publishing, Tehran Khak.
Bemanian, M., Derazgiso, A., & Salem,P. (2013). A Comparative Study of Symbolism and Signs in Architectural Works of Safavid and Contemporary Periods in Iran. The Role of the Universe Quarterly Journal, 3, 13-21.
Daad, S. (2008). Dictionary of Literary Terms. (4 th  ed.). Tehran: Morvarid.
Sobat Sani, N.(2013). Introduction to some of the influential factors on contemporary Iranianarchitecture between 1320 and 1357 AH. Armanshahr Architecture and Urban Planning, 11, 49-60.
Grutter, J.K. (2010). Asthetik der Architektur: Grundlagen der Architektur-WahrnehmungPakzad. J, Tehran: Center for Rehabilitation of the Blind Country Rudaki.
Hatam, G. A. (2000). Islamic Architecture of Iran during the Seljuk period. Tehran: Jahad University Press.
Habib, F., & Hosseini, A. (2010). an Analysis of Iran's Contemporary Architecture inConfronting with the Globalization. Journal of Urban Identity, 4,  89-99.
Iran Industrial Design (2010). Semiotics in Product Design, Retrieved from http://www, 2013.02.09
Jorgen D.J., & Larsen, S. (2009). Signs in Use: An Introduction to Semiotics, Miremadi.(2th ed.). Tehran: Varjavand.
Kosari, M. (2008). Semiotics of Mass Media. Quarterly Journal of Media, 73, 38.[a2] 
Noghrehkar, A. H., & Raisi, M. (2011). Semantic Analysis of Iranian Housing System Basedonthe Relationship between Text / Housing Layers. Magazine of Fine Arts, 46.[a3] 
Noghrehkar, A H. (2010), An Introduction to Islamic Identity in Architecture and Mehr. Tehran: Sima publishing.
Naghizadeh, M. (2004). Kaaba is a manifestation and beauty interpretation. Magazine of Fine Arts,17 18-5.
Parsania, H. (1994). Symbol and myth Qom,Tehran: Institute of Tomorrow book..
Saberi Kakhaki, S. (2012).The principle of Amazement in Iranian Islamic Architecture and theRole of Decoration, International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development. 3 39[a4] -44.
Safavi, K. (2004). the formation of signs, the collection of articles of the first contemporary semiotics of art. Tehran: Azad University Press.
Samaniyan, S., & Pardisi, B. (2010). an Exploration Using Semantic Perspectives in ProductDesign. Iranian Journal of Architecture and Urban Development. 1  37- 42.
Shahin, Sh. (2004). The study of the color symbol in the theater and literature and in the religionof the nations . Fine Arts Publishing. 18  99-108.
Saussure, Fd. (1966). Course in General Linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Vaheddust, M. (2002) Scientific Approaches to Mythology, SoroushPublications House, Tehran.
Yavari, H. (2011), Siri in Iranian Art and Architecture, Tehran :Danesh Publications.
Yong, k. G. (2013). Man and his symbols, Translator: Mahmood Soltanieh.(9th ed.). Tehran: Jami Publications,.
Rasaneh, S.(2018) Retrieved  July ,2018 , from
Majidi,(2017).December,2017, from https://
Anobanini(2017). December,2017, from
Anobanini(2017). December,2017, from[h5]