The Role of Class Scale in Promotion of Students’ Participation in Active Learning Process (Case Study: Male Students of a Secondary School in Shiraz)

Document Type : Original Paper


1 Assistant Professor, Technical department of Yasuj University, Yasuj, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of architecture and urban design, Yasooj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yasooj, Iran.

3 Master Student of Architecture, Department of architecture and urban design, Yasooj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yasooj, Iran.


Perception and experience gained in the contemporary school could not help human beings' active learning. Totally, participation is the main element in active learning and thus, the active participation of students in the learning process is emphasized by education and learning in secondary schools. Given the importance of active learning, in this paper, the effective components in this type of learning has been identified. Among the three components involved in active learning, the component of participation in the learning process is selected and after a study of the model, two factors affecting the participation of children in the learning process are specified including social pattern and activation pattern of participation in the learning process. In this paper, the research uses a mixed method including a quantitative part and a qualitative part. The quantitative part uses a univariate T-test and the qualitative part uses a case-study method and content analysis to analyze the semi-structured interview. The study population in the quantitative part includes 279 male students of a secondary school in the city of Shiraz and the qualitative part includes 43 male students of the seventh grade of a secondary school in Shiraz. The results show that the majority of the respondents prefer a small class size. The findings emphasize the concept of participation in the learning process and introduce the factors of social interaction, individual and group activities, involvement and experience in the learning process for the indoor educational environment design and ultimately emphasize the factor of interaction as the most important criterion. 


Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of learning. New York: Oxford University Press.
Aspadk, B. (2004). Early childhood education, translated by Mohammad Nazari Nejad, Tehran: Astan Quds Razavi Publication.
Bonwell, C.C. & Eison, J.A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom, ASHE-ERIC Higher education Report No.1, Washington DC: George Washington University press.
Chan, T.C.(1996). Environmental Impact on Student Learning. Departement of Educational  Leadership, College of Education, Valdosta State University, Valdosta, Georgia.
Chen, J. J. L. (2008). Grade-level differences: Relations of parental, teacher and peer support to academic engagement and achievement among Hong Kong students. School Psychology International, 29(2), 183-198.
Colle, A.L. (2011). A critical review of elementary school design, unpublished thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Dotterer. A,M & Lowe. k, (2010). Classroom context, School Engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence, Journal of youth and adolescence,40(12),1649-1660.
Feliciano, K. (2011). Waterfront Connections: A Dynamic Learning Environment for Downtown Seattle Kristina. Master of Architecture thesis, University of Washington.
Reid, A., Jensen, B. B., Nikel, J., & Simovska, V. (2008). Participation and learning: Developing perspectives on education and the environment, health and sustainability. In Participation and learning (pp. 1-18). Springer, Dordrecht.
Keramati, M.R. (2007). The effect of collaborative learning on social skills development and mathematical achievement. Journal of Psychology and Education, 1(37), pp. 39-55.
Masan, P. H. (1995). Child growth and personality, Translated by Mahshid Yasaii, Tehran: Markaz. [In Persian].
Moore, G, T. & Lackney, J, A. (1993). School design: Crisis, Educational Performance and Design Applications, Children's Environments,10(2), pp 99-112.
Bakhtiar Nasr Abadi. H.A.,  & Norouzi, R. A. (2005), Analysis of the effect of cooperative learning on students' academic and social growth, Journal of Faculty of Humanities, 57, pp.161- 180.
Nisbet, D., Spaulding, L., & Wighting, M. (2009). "Relationships between Sense of Community and Academic Achievement: A Comparison among High School Students. The International Journal of the Humanities, 7(3), 63-72.
Oblinger, D, G ( 2006), Learning Spaces.Washington, DC: EDUCAUSE press.
Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education,93 (3), 223-235.
Ramirez, G. A. (2014). Classroom Design for Urban Students. unpublished Ph.D. thesis in Doctor of Education, University of California, Los Angeles.
- Seif. A. A. (2011). New Breeding psychology: Learning and teaching psychology. Tehran: Douran Publication. Scardamalia, M & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building.Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K.Sawyer (ED),The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp.97-118).New York:Cambridge University Press.
Slavin, R. (1994). A summary of studies on collaborative learning, translated by Fatemeh Faghihi, Journal of Education, Tehran.
Shariatmadari, A. (1995), The educational and scientific mission of education centers, Human ICTS Tehran University: Tehran.
Taylor,A.(2009). linking architecture and Education: sustainable design for learning environments, The University of New Mexico Press: New Mexico.
Tileston, D.W.(2000).10 best teaching practices, Corwin press, A Sage Publications Company, U.S.A.
David, T. G., & Weinstein, C. S. (1987). The built environment and children’s development. In Spaces for children (pp. 3-18). Springer, Boston, MA.
Wolff, S. J. (2002). Design future for Project-Based Learning, Oregon state university, Ph.D. Dissertation.