Providing Empirical Suggestions for Rehabilitation of Deficient Urban Parks Based upon Users' Preferences

Document Type: Original Paper

Authors

1 Faculty Member, Department of Landscape Design, Malayer University, Iran

2 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Geography, Michigan State University, USA

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the preferences of urban dwellers for various
elements of urban parks in order to provide some important suggestions for rehabilitation of urban deficient parks. In
this regard, this study has conducted a survey in one of the oldest parks in Khorramabad, Iran, to reveal the overall
satisfaction of the park situation and to explore the preferences of users regarding the characteristics of appropriate hard
and soft landscape elements of the park. This paper uses five independent combined analyses covering elements of the
urban park, including locational, functional, physical, visual and the vegetation characteristics in order to provide the
most preferable elements for rehabilitation of this park. For finding significant results, questionnaires are distributed
among 100 park users during spring 2014. Findings of the research show general dissatisfaction regarding the existing
condition of the park and provide some key points that can be helpful for improvement of the quality of the park based
on visitors' ideas.

Keywords


Barghjelveh, Sh., & Sayad, N. (2011). Using the Component Model of Sustainable Landscape for the Quality Assessment of Urban Natural Public Spaces: A Case Study from Tehran’s River-valleys. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development; Vol.1, No.2, 5-24.

Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning; 68, 129–138.

Crane, P., & Kinzig, A. (2005). Nature in the metropolis. Science, 308 (5726), 1225.

English Nature, (2005). The English Nature Website, Retrieved on July 15th, 2013 from http://www.englishnature.gov.uk

Gaston, K.J., Warren, P.H., Thompson, K., & Smith, R.M. (2005). Urban domestic gardens(IV) : the extent of the resource and its associated features. Biodiversity and Conservation; 14, 3327–3349.

Germann-Chiari, C., & Seeland, K. (2004). Are urban green spaces optimally distributed to act as places for social integration? Results of a geographical information system (GIS) approach for urban forestry research. Forest Policy and Economics; 3–13.

Goodarzi, M., Haghtalab, N., & Shamshiri, E. (2015). Wellness tourism in Sareyn, Iran: resources, planning and development. Current Issues in Tourism; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2015.1012192.

Habibi Nokhandan, M., Haghtalab, N., Malboosi, Sh., Abasi, F., & Goodarzi, M. (2011). Quantitative Assessment of Climate Change by Weather Generation Models and Downscaling GCM Data in Tehran, Iran. Global Food Insecurity: Rethinking Agricultural and Rural Development Paradigm and Policy; 233-244. DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0890-7_16.

Im, S.B. (1984). Visual preferences in enclosed urban spaces and exploration of a approach to environmental design. Environment and Behavior. 16, 235–262.

Javan Forouzande, A., & Motallebi, Gh. (2012). The Role of Open Spaces in Neighborhood Attachment, Case Study: Ekbatan Town in Tehran Metropolis. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development; Vol.1, No.3, 11-20.

Katoshevski, R., & Timmermans, H. (2001). Using conjoint analysis to formulateuser-centred guidelines for urban design: the example of new residential development - in Israel. Journal of Urban Design; 6, 37–53.

Lee, B. K., Sohn, S. Y., &  Yang, S. (2014). Design guidelines for the Dashilar, Beijing Open Green Space Project Redevelopment. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.12.008.

Mambretti, I.M. (2011). Urban Parks Between Safety and Aesthetics: Exploring Urban Green Space Using Visualization and Conjoint Analysis Methods, vol. 4. vdfHochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich, Zürich.

Martin, C.A., Warren, P.S., & Kinzig, A.P. (2004). Neighborhood socioeconomic status is a useful predictor of perennial landscape vegetation in residential neighborhoods and embedded small parks of Phoenix, AZ. Landscape and Urban Planning; 69, 355–368.

Masnavi, M.R., Goodarzi, M., Faryadi, Sh., & Haghtalab, N. (2012). Investigation of Environmental Design Strategies for Urban-periphery Zone by Fractal Patterns and Natural Geometry; the Case of Northern Hillsides of Tehran.  Journal of Environmental Sciences; 10 (02), 91-106.

Myers, J. E., Sweeney, T. J., & Witmer, M. (2005). A holistic model of wellness. Retrieved from http://www.mindgarden.com/products/wells.htm, March 17, 2010.

Nordh, H., Alalouch, C., & Hartig, T. (2010). Assessing restorative components of small urban parks using conjoint methodology. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening; 10, 95–103.

Peschardt, K.K., Schipperjin, J., & Stigsdotter, U.K. (2012). Use of small public urban green spaces (SPUGS). Urban Forestry and Urban Greening; 11, 235–244.

Steiner, C. J., & Reisinger, Y. (2006). Ringing the fourfold: A philosophical framework for thinking about wellness tourism. Tourism Recreation Research; 31(1), 5–14.

Takano, T., Nakamura, K., & Watanabe, M. (2002). Urban residential environments and citizens’ longevity in megacity areas: the importance of walkable green senior spaces. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health; 56, 913–918.

Wray, S. (2005). Audit of the Towns, Cities and Development Work Stream of the Biodiversity Strategy. English Nature. England.

Zhou, X., & Wang, Y. (2011). Spatial–temporal dynamics of urban green spaces in response to rapid urbanization and greening policies. Landscape and Urban Planning; 100, 268–277.