Developing the Conceptual and Methodological Framework for Discursive-institutional Analysis of Coastal Exclusive Space Production: with Special Reference to Critical Realism Perspective

Document Type: Original Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Urban Planning and Architecture, IUST (Iran University of Science and Technology) Tehran, Iran.

2 Ph.D. Candidate of Urban and Regional planning, IUST (Iran University of Science and Technology) Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Because of the limited capacity of coastal lands and conflicting interests among stakeholders for coastal resources, there are intensifying pressures to retain and provide more public access to the coast. Coastal gated communities have been developed increasingly in the middle shoreline of Caspian Sea in North of Iran. They are kind of exclusive space production as they restrict public access to the public resources of shoreline. As space production has roots in social processes, according to Lefebvre’s theory, there are two main approaches in the analysis of social phenomena. First is institutionalism and the other one is discourse analysis. Due to some weaknesses each approach suffered from, the discursive institutionalism became the main methodology to analyze the interaction of discourses and institutions in coastal exclusive space production.  Critical realism emphasizes the inherent feature of the world which is categorized into three layers of reality that are constructed by agents, discourses and structures. Rather than experiencing the world in constructivism or conceptualizing the world in interpretivism, critical realism supposes different ontology, the existence of hidden or invisible mechanisms behind what human understand from the social phenomena and though emphasizing on the causality of both agents and structures. This research aims to conduct the conceptual and methodological framework for the analysis of the exclusive space production as a social phenomenon in North of Iran with the help of critical realism perspective in discursive institutionalism approach. This could be a significant guideline for further researches on spatial evolution in coastal urban areas.  

Keywords


Arts, B., & Buizer, M. (2009). Forests, discourses, institutions: A discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance. Forest policy and economics11(5-6), 340-347.

Banai, R. (1995). Critical realism, and urban and regional studies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design22(5), 563-580.

Blaikie, N. (2000). Design social research: the logic of anticipation.

Denzau, A. T., & North, D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions. Kyklos47(1), 3-31.

Faircloughf, N. (2005). Critical Discourse Analysis. Marges Linguistiques, 9, 76-94.

Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (Eds.). (1993).The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press.

Gerhards, J. (1995). Framing dimensions and framing strategies: contrasting ideal-and real-type frames. Social Science Information34(2), 225-248.

Gorges, M. J. (2001). New institutionalist explanations for institutional change: A note of caution. Politics21(2), 137-145.

Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process (p. 40). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of environmental policy & planning7(3), 175-184.

Healey, P. (1992). Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory. Town planning review, 63(2), 143.

Hope, M. (2010, March). Frame Analysis as a Discourse-Method: Framing ‘climate change politics. In Proceedings of Post-Graduate Conference on Discourse Analysis, Bristol. https://www. scribd. com/document/338564425/Frame-Analysis-as-a-Discourse-Method-Framing-Climate-Change-Politics-Mat-Hope.

Kheyroddin, R., & Hedayatifard, M. (2017). Social Segregation to Exclusive Public Shoreline Access: Coastal Gated Communities on the Middle Shoreline of the Caspian Sea in Northern Iran. Journal of Urban Planning and Development143(3), 05017006.

Kheyroddin, R., Hedayatifard, M. (2015). Actors and processes behind exclusiveness of coastal lands: From institutional aspects to spatial outputs. Middle shoreline of Caspian Sea of Iran. in Jean-Marie BRETON, Olivier DEHOORNE et Jean-Marie FURT, Spaces and island and coastal environments. Accessibility - vulnerability – resilience", Editor Paris, Karthala, 158-177, 2015.

Kouzehchi, H. (2014). Strategy of investment in Housing Market. Tehran: The world on economy publication. (In Persian)

Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. Verso.

McAnulla, S. (2006). Challenging the new interpretivist approach: Towards a critical realist alternative. British politics, 1(1), 113-138.

Mingers, J. (2011). The contribution of systemic thought to critical realism. Journal of Critical Realism10(3), 303-330.

Næss, P. (2015). Critical realism, urban planning and urban research. European Planning Studies23(6), 1228-1244.

Rosenbaum, E. F. (2001). Culture, cognitive models, and the performance of institutions in transformation countries. Journal of Economic Issues35(4), 889-909.

Scharpf, F. W. (2000). Institutions in comparative policy research. Comparative political studies33(6-7), 762-790.

Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual review of political science11.