Evaluation of New Urbanism Principles: Hybrid AHP-TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Analysis Framework (Case Study: Neighborhoods of Historical Zone of Shiraz)

Document Type: Original Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student of Urbanism at Islamic Azad University of Tehran, Since & Research Branch

2 Professor of Tehran University, School of Art

Abstract

A large number of studies show that uncontrolled and unplanned spatial and functional developments
in old central districts of large and medium-sized Iranian cities in past few decades have resulted in many unpleasant
transformations. Thus, the historic urban fabrics have gradually lost their socio-economic livability and quality and this
issue has led to urban distress, blight and deterioration.
The main objective of this research is to evaluate quality of historical neighborhood of zone eight of Shiraz metropolis
municipality [Old CBD] according to set criteria based on New Urbanism Approach and Principles. This is applied
research with descriptive – analytical methodology, using a hybrid AHP – TOPSSIS analysis methodology. By ranking
these historical districts according to their current quality and capacity, we can determine best cases for development
with the low intervention level strategy. The results of multi criteria analysis indicate that among the twelve districts in
the historical fabric of Shiraz, Sang-e-Siyah, Mordestan and Meydan-e-Shah are the three best cases for development
regarding the potentials and capacity and qualities in historical fabric of Shiraz.

Keywords


· Ahadnejhad, M., Yarigholi,V. & Norozi.,M.J. (2016), “Spatial Analysis of The Indexes of Life Quality Using a Multi- Criteria Decision Making Approach (A Case Study of Abhar Municipal Regions) ”, Space Ontology International Journal, 5 Issue 2, Spring 2016, 11 – 21 .
· Anonymous. The value of public space, vol. 19. Commission for architecture and the built environment (CABE) space. London; 2003. p. 1–19.
· Celem H, Oguz D. Dis mekan tasariminda yaslilar icin alinmasi gerekli onlemler. Yasli Sorunlarini Arastirma Dergisi 2001; 1(1): 35–43.
· Elbas, NO., Arpaci. F., Yasli bireyin evde saglik bakimi. In: Kalınkara V, Yayinevi O, editor. Yaslilik Disiplinlerarası Yaklasim, Sorunlar, Cozumler, vol. 236. Ankara. 2003. p. 119–134 [ISBN: 975-92257-2-7].
· Gehl J. Life between buildings: using public space. Arkitektens Forlag 1986.
· Gungor N. Yaslilikta sosyal butunlesme, vol. 80. Sosyal Devlet Yaklasiminda 2000’li Yillara Dogru Olgun Genclik Sempozyumu. 20 Marts 1995, Ankara Universitesi Basimevi, Ankara. 1995. p. 56–65.
· Harrison, J. D. (1997). Housing for elderly people: design for an ageing population in Singapore. Handicaps’ Digest, 16-30.Heidari, A.A. Moradian, S. Teimoori, P. (2016), “Evaluation of Place Attachment Rate in Home, Neighborhood and Urban (Case Study: Shiraz City, Iran), International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development Vol.6, No.4, 33-42. 
· ICMA. Active living for older adults: management strategies for healthy and livable communities, vol. 16. International city/ county management association. September, IN: 43000. 2003. p. 1–16.
· Kalinkara V. Yaslilarin konut ve yakin cevreye yonelik beklentileri uzerinde bir arastirma. Yasli Sorunlarini Arastirma Dergisi 2001;1(1):1–13.
· Kalinkara V. Yasli konutlarinda ic mekan tasariminin ergonomic boyutu. In: Kalinkara V, Yay O, editor. Yaslilik Disiplinlerarasi Yaklasim, Sorunlar, Cozumler, vol. 236. Ankara. 2003. p. 59–79 [ISBN: 975-92257-2-7].
· Kreuzer V. (2006) Altengerechte Wohnquartiere – Stadtplanerische Empfehlungen für den Umgang mit der demographischen Alterung auf kommunaler Ebene. Dortmunder Beiträge zur Raumplanung 125, Dortmund: Blaue Reihe; IRPUD.
· Kreuzer, V. & Reicher, C. & Scholz, T. (ed.) (2008) Zukunft Alter Stadtplanerische Handlungsansätze zur altersgerechten Quartiersentwicklung, Dortmunder Beiträge zur Raumplanung 130, Dortmund: Blaue Reihe; IRPUD.
· Lapinitie, I. (2007), Modalities of Urban Space. Sage Publications. Forthcoming in Planning Theory. 6 (1), 36-51.
· Low SM. Urban public spaces as representations of culture: the plaza in Costa Rica. Environment and Behaviour 1997; 29(1):31–3.
· Moughtin C. Urban design: street and square, vol. 238. Architectural Press; 1999. p. 127–171.
· Nozari,M. ,Mazloumi, M. ,Salehi, E. (2015), “Sense of Security from the Environmental Perspective A Case Study of Tehran’s Pardisan Park”, Space Ontology International Journal, 5 Issue 2, Spring 2016, 1-10.
· Oguz D. Yaslilar ve erisebilirlik. In: Kalinkara V, Evi OY, editors. Yaslilik Disiplinlerarası Yaklasim, Sorunlar, Cozumler. vol. 236. Ankara. 2003. p. 101–117 [ISBN: 975-92257-2-7].
· Oguz D. Yaslililik ve kentsel yesil alan tasarimi. I, vol. 489. Ulusal Yaslilik Kongresi, 10–11 Ekim 2001, Ankara. 2001. p. 33–40.
· Pakdil FA. Yasli (ve ozurluler) icin kentsel alanlarin tasarimi. I, vol. 407. Ulusal Yaslilik Kongresi, 10–11 Ekim 2001, Ankara. 2001. p. 15–18s.
· Rubenstein HM. Pedestrian malls, streetscapes and urban spaces, vol. 272. New York: Wiley; 1992. p. 1–21.
· Sobouti, H. (1987), “history of Zanjan”, Zanjan: Department of Culture and Islamic Guidance press.
· Steffen, G. & Baumann, D. & Antje, F. & Weeber + Partner (2007) Attraktive Stadtquartiere für das Leben im Alter. Bauforschung für die Praxis, Band 82, Stuttgart: Fraunhofer IRB
· World Health Organisation (WHO). 1946. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, June 19-22, 1946. WHO, Geneva, GE.
· Zeraatpisheh, H.R., Movahed, KH.,Keshmiri, H . (2016), “Effects of Place Identity: the Quality of Urban Sustainable Development (Case Study: Hafez's Tomb in Shiraz)”, International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, Vol.6, No.3, summer 2016, 55-62.