Navigation in Determining the Physical Factors Affecting Creativity of Children's in Urban Parks

Document Type: Original Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Art and Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Art and Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Professor, Department of Art and Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Despite the availability of extensive facilities for children, the effect of environment on creativity
of children is often ignored. It is a fact that children can attend the playgrounds in city parks, independently, from age
6, therefore they become exposed to influence of the environment during this age period. It is necessary to design
playgrounds for children to improve their creativity. The objective here is to assess the effects of physical components
of the playgrounds in city parks on creativity of children of ages 6 to 12. A descriptive- analytic method is adopted in
this study. This method is adopted to achieve the theoretical perspectives and correlations between the variables and
indices, through analysis. At this stage, the data are collected from a selected statistical population through field research
and closed response researcher designed questionnaire and the effective variables are determined by factor analysis and
correlation. By applying path analysis method using of Smart PLS1 software program based on the relations between
the variables, the study model is provided. The results indicate that there exists a significant correlation between the
environmental factors and creativity and regarding the rate of effectiveness of the physical factors on creativity, the
variety factor is more effective, followed by physical liveliness and flexibility factors, respectively.

Keywords


Ahadi, H. and Bani jamali,Sh. (2010). Growth psychology:Fundamental concepts in child psychology. Tehran: jeyhoon Press.
Altman, I., Wohlwill, J. & Rapoport, A. (1980). Human Behavior and Environment: Advances in Theory and Research. Environment and Culture. Plenum Press.
Amabile, T., Hill, K., Hennessey, B. & Tighe, E. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 66(5), 950.
Amabile, T. & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. The journal of creative behavior, 46(1), 3-15.
Barclay, D., Higgins, C. & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology studies, 2(2), 285-309.
B Eigbeonan, Andrew. (2015). Sustainability and Creativity Methods: Agents of Change in Teaching the Arch-Design Studio. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 5(3), 5-16.
Bently, I. (2004). Responsive Environments. (M. Behzadfar). Tehran: University of Science and Industry.
Brodersen, R. (2005). Environmental effects on creative thinking and the role of affect, arousal, and person-environment fit. Colorado State University.
Christensen, P. & O'Brien, M. (2003). Children in the city: Home neighbourhood and community. Routledge.
Crowhurst, S. & Lenard, H. (1999). Designing urban space and social life. (R. Mojtabapour). Journal of architecture and urbanism, 45,46.
Davari, A. & Rezazadeh, A. (2015). Structural equation modeling with pls software. Tehran: Organization Jahad Daneshgahi Press.
Eyniefar, A., (2004). A model for Analysis the flexibility in traditional housing. Honarhaye Ziba Journal. Urban- architecture, 13, 64-77.
Fainstein, S. and DeFilippis, J. (2015). Readings in planning theory. John Wiley & Sons.
Fallah, M.,  Masoud, M. & Navaie, A. (2014). Role of resilient and flexible urban space in disaster Management.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage Publication.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.
Guilford, J. (1966). Intelligence: 1965 model. American Psychologist, 21(1), 20.
Hemlin, S., Allwood, C. & Martin, B. (2008). Creative knowledge environments. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 196-210.
Karami, S., Fakhrayee, A., & Karami, S. (2015). Studying the Effect of Accessibility and Vitality on Urban Space Efficiency in Iran (Case Study: Hamadan City). International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 5(1), 33-40.
Knoflacher, H. (2003). Principles of planning and design for pedestrian and bicycle traffic. (F. Gharib), Tehran: Tehran University Press.
Kristensen, T. (2004). The physical context of creativity. Creativity and innovation management, 13(2), 89-96.
Landry, C. (2000). Urban Vitality: a new source of Urban Competitiveness. ARCHIS, (12), 8-13.
Lynch, K. (2003). The theory of town, Tehran: Tehran University Press.
Lubart, T. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité: Armand Colin.
Meerow, S., Newell, J. & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38-49.
Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2013). City life: Rankings (livability) versus perceptions (satisfaction). Social indicators research, 110(2), 433-451.
Pakzad, J. (2006). Guide the design of urban spaces in Iran. Tehran: Department of Housing and Urban Development and Architecture.
Paumier, C. (2004). Creating a vibrant city center: urban design and regeneration principles: Urban Land Inst.
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child: Basic Books.
Plambech, T. & Van Den Bosch, C. (2015). The impact of nature on creativity–A study among Danish creative professionals. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(2), 255-263.
Runco, M. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice: Elsevier.
Sharepour, M. (2010). Urban sociology. Tehran: Semat Press.
Talen, E. (2012). Design for diversity: Routledge.
Thórisson, H. (2004). A framework for exploring the evolutionary roots of creativity. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ECCBR 2004).
Tibbalds, F. (1990). Urban design. Pt. 6: public v private realm. Architects' Journal, 192, 59-61.
Torrance, E. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. The nature of creativity, 43-75.
Webster, M. (2006). Merriam-Webster online dictionary.
Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G. & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS quarterly, 177-195.
Zaker Haghighi, K.; Habib, F.; Majedi, H., (2011). Codification indicators affecting the typology of urban context. Journal of city identity, 7, 105-112.